Two boards, one broken. Crude cleared its whole ladder overnight and the equity book did not move.
- The weekend put a war premium in crude and nothing elseCENTCOM confirmed US forces struck two Iranian rocket launchers on Larak Island in the Strait of Hormuz on Sunday, saying IRGC units were preparing to launch rockets carrying sea mines into the strait. Early Monday the IRGC fired ballistic missiles at two US air bases in Jordan — King Hussein and Al-Azraq — and Jordan’s military says it intercepted eight missiles that entered its airspace at dawn. The IRGC also struck Al Minhad Air Base in the UAE with drones, which is the leg that matters: an attack on Gulf soil is a supply-corridor event, not a Levant event. WTI +3.73%, Brent +3.55%. Gold is down 0.38%, the two-year is down 2.9 basis points, the dollar is down 0.18%. The hedge is being expressed in one asset only.
- One strike is doing three jobs and none of them survive the bellMax pain for today’s expiry, the put wall, and the line carrying the largest gamma on either side are all the same price — 7,710 in futures, four points above where ES is trading. Every mechanism that has flattened this tape for a month is stacked on a contract with hours left on it. Section 04.
- The hike is now the base case, and one desk is fading itCME FedWatch has the September 16 meeting pricing a hike as the base case, up from 41.4% a week ago, with a cut at zero. Goldman’s Jan Hatzius is the only tier-A desk on the other side, and his condition is precise. Barclays and Deutsche Bank both flipped over the weekend to two hikes this year. Sections 05 and 09.
- Friday’s damage was under the surface, not on itThe S&P fell only 0.25% to 7,711.76 and the Dow was flat — but the Russell 2000 lost 1.39%, biotech dropped 3.41%, and the two-year yield jumped 14 basis points in a single session. Gold settled −3.18%, its worst day of the move. The index absorbed a rate shock that the things underneath it did not.
- Volatility is bid before the bell, off the year’s lowVIX closed Friday at 14.43 after printing 14.13 intraday, the 2026 low. It is back above 15 this morning, up more than five percent. Nine-day VIX is 11.22 and IV Rank on the index is 7.69% — the fifth percentile. Protection into a payrolls week has almost never been cheaper in dollar terms, which is a fact about price, not a recommendation.
Where everything sits on the last morning of August
| Instrument | Last | Change | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| ES Sep S&P 500 E-mini, live | 7,706.25 | −0.20% | Settled 7,722.00, +10.24 over cash. Overnight low 7,683.75 on the Iran headlines, since recovered. Sits 32.6 points below Cannon’s daily pivot of 7,738.83 and eleven above S1 — Section 04 |
| NQ Sep Nasdaq 100 E-mini, live | 29,437.75 | −0.18% | Settled 29,491.75 after −0.49% Friday. Holding better than the S&P this morning — the reverse of Friday, when tech was the worst sector at −1.29% |
| YM Sep Dow E-mini, live | 53,474 | −0.21% | Settled 53,584. The Dow is up 2.1% for August, a fifth consecutive monthly gain, and is the index with the most to lose from a weak close |
| RTY Sep Russell E-mini, live | 2,973.20 | −0.14% | Settled 2,977.50. Cash Russell fell 1.39% Friday to 2,972.37 — five times the S&P’s decline. Cannon’s pivot is 2,993.43, twenty points above here |
| S&P 500 cash prior close | 7,711.76 | −0.25% | Down 19.23. The record close of 7,816.70 on August 13 is 1.4% above here |
| Nasdaq Composite prior close | 26,402.42 | −0.52% | Nvidia fell 2.58% on the session, giving back part of Thursday’s post-earnings move |
| Russell 2000 prior close | 2,972.37 | −1.39% | The session’s real casualty and the cleanest read on a fourteen-basis-point move in the two-year |
| VIX live | 15.20 | +5.34% | Friday close 14.43; the 14.13 intraday print is the 2026 low. VVIX 86.63 (+4.31%), SKEW 149.77, nine-day VIX 11.22 |
| WTI Oct live | 86.51 | +3.73% | Settled 83.40. Session range 84.11–86.79. Trading above Cannon’s R3 of 85.54 — the entire resistance ladder is behind it. Section 04 |
| Brent Nov live | 91.23 | +3.55% | Settled 88.10. October is in expiry and is no longer the front month; the spread to WTI is $4.72 |
| Gold Dec live | 4,512.60 | −0.38% | Settled 4,529.90 after −3.18% Friday on the speech. Traded down to 4,445.60 overnight and recovered sixty-seven dollars — but is still red on a day crude is up nearly four percent |
| Silver Dec live | 67.97 | +0.26% | Settled 67.79 after −4.20% Friday, the worst single row on Cannon’s board. It is the only metal green this morning |
| US 10Y live yield | 4.724% | +0.2 bp | Friday’s par close 4.73%, up six basis points on the session. Flat this morning despite the oil move — the inflation impulse is not being paid for in the long end yet |
| US 2Y live yield | 4.321% | −2.9 bp | Friday’s par close 4.34%, up fourteen basis points in one session. 2s10s +40.3 bp, steepening from the front — the leg that is supposed to price the hike is backing off it this morning |
| US 30Y live yield | 5.219% | +1.1 bp | Friday par close 5.22%. The long end rose less than the front on a hawkish speech, which is the shape a credible central bank produces |
| DXY live | 99.52 | −0.18% | Closed 99.70, +0.61% Friday, a two-week high. EUR/USD 1.160, USD/JPY 159.65 — the yen has given back most of the July intervention gain |
| Bitcoin live | 78,300 | −1.0% | Settled 79,088 after −1.22%. Cannon’s pivot is 78,644 — price is sitting just under it |
| Overnight Asia / Europe | — | — | Nikkei −0.14% after being down more than 1,500 points at the open and recovering all day; Hang Seng −0.07%, Shanghai +0.86% on a China manufacturing PMI of 49.8 against 49.7 expected — a beat, and a second month in contraction. Europe: DAX −0.67% is the weak spot, Stoxx 50 −0.18%, CAC +0.16% |
Sentiment & flow gauges
| Gauge | Reading | Prior | What it says |
|---|---|---|---|
| CNN Fear & Greed | 54 | 54 | NEUTRAL Unchanged. A week ago 56, a month ago 45, a year ago 61 |
| — the split inside it | 3 of 7 | — | Junk-bond demand at extreme greed is holding the index up alone. Momentum, price strength and safe-haven demand are all at fear. Credit is buying; the tape is not |
| AAII bulls | 32.9% | 35.5% | Against a long-run average of 37.5%. Week to August 26 |
| AAII bears | 44.4% | 39.9% | −11.5 Bears 12.9 points above their 31.5% average and up 4.5 points on the week. Neutral at 22.6% is well under its 31.0% average — people are picking sides, not standing aside |
| Dealer gamma regime | POS | POS | LONG GAMMA Cash closed comfortably above the flip. The dampening is real and it is concentrated on one expiring strike. Levels in Section 04 |
| Index IV rank | 7.69% | — | Fifth percentile. Implied 11.86% against realised 11.72% — the option market is charging essentially nothing over delivered movement going into payrolls week |
| VIX term structure | +1.77 | — | September future 17.01, October 18.78. Contango of 10.4% front to second month. Vol is bid at the front without any term-structure stress behind it |
| Put/call — equity vs index | 0.62 / 1.15 | — | Friday’s Cboe ratios. Single names call-heavy at 0.62, SPX and SPXW put-heavy at 1.15. A half-point gap between what people speculate in and what they hedge with |
| Breadth — above 50-day | 53.60% | 54.0% | Falling, and now below its own fifty-day (63.51) and two-hundred-day (56.01) averages. The share above the 200-day is a healthier 71.00% |
| Equal weight vs cap weight | −91 bp | — | RSP −0.44% against SPY +0.47% over the last five sessions. Leadership narrowed into the speech, not out of it |
| Sept FOMC — hike | 59.9% | 57.0% | Hold 40.1%, cut 0.0%. A week ago the hike was 41.4%. Section 09 |
The flow read
The single most useful number on this board is the gap between the equity put/call at 0.62 and the SPX put/call at 1.15. Retail and single-name flow is buying calls; the index book is buying puts. That is not a contradiction, it is a division of labour — the beta is being hedged at the index level while the speculation happens in individual names, which is exactly the configuration that lets breadth deteriorate underneath a flat index for weeks at a time. Friday made it visible: the S&P lost a quarter of a percent, the Russell lost 1.39%, and the equal-weight index has now lagged the cap-weighted index by ninety-one basis points over five sessions.
Underneath that, the survey data keeps moving one way. AAII bears rose 4.5 points on the week while neutral fell eight points under its historical average — the fence is emptying and the people leaving it are going short. CNN’s composite is unchanged at 54, but three of its seven components sit at fear and the only one at extreme greed is junk-bond demand. Credit is the last gauge still voting risk-on.
The month-end mechanic sits on top of all of it. A fifth consecutive monthly gain in the Dow and a roughly three-percent month in the S&P mean the direction of any mechanical rebalance into this afternoon’s close leans toward selling equities and buying bonds — direction, not magnitude, and it lands in the same hour as the expiration.
Yesterday’s calls graded
An empty Monday in front of the heaviest data week since June
| When | Event | Consensus | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 8/31 | Month-end close · Dallas Fed mfg 10:30 | — | Prior 1.3. Nothing at 08:30 and nothing that moves an index — the session belongs to the expiration and the rebalance. The Dow closes a fifth consecutive up month |
| Tue 9/1 | ISM Manufacturing 10:00 · ISM Prices Paid · JOLTS · Fed Barr 09:05 | 55.3 | Prior 55.6. Prices Paid consensus 72.0 against 71.1 is the line that matters with crude up four percent — it is the first read on whether the oil move reaches the input cost data. JOLTS 7.39M vs 7.359M |
| Wed 9/2 | ADP 08:15 · Beige Book 14:00 · Broadcom AMC | +47K | ADP prior +44K. Broadcom is the AI complex’s next referendum: consensus $3.24 EPS on $29.4bn revenue, up 91.7% and 84.9% year over year. Section 08 |
| Thu 9/3 | Claims 08:30 · Fed Waller 08:30 · ISM Services 10:00 · Fed Hammack 15:00 | 205K | Prior 203K. ISM Services 54.1 against 54.1. Waller speaks at the same minute as the data drop, and he and Hammack are the last two live Fed voices before the vote |
| Fri 9/4 | August employment report 08:30 | +45K | Prior −23,000. Unemployment 4.2% consensus against 4.1%; average hourly earnings +0.2% against +0.1%. This is the print the September meeting turns on, and it lands the day before blackout |
| Sat 9/5 | Fed blackout begins | — | The September FOMC concludes Wednesday September 16. From Saturday, no official can correct a mispricing — and August CPI has not printed yet. Section 10 |
Scenario language describes how desks and pricing frame outcomes. It is not a recommendation.
Two methods that share no inputs, agreeing to within two points at both ends of the range
| Gamma level | SPX | ES Sep · +10.24 | Role in today’s tape |
|---|---|---|---|
| Call wall · ceiling | 7,800.00 | 7,810 | Unmoved for a fourth session and the single heaviest line in the book at roughly 72,939 calls — the largest open interest at any strike on either side. It sits 88 points above cash and 104 above the futures price, which is more than one percent, and it has not been tested since August 13. Cannon’s R2 for today is 7,809.58 — two-thirds of a point from the same price by pivot arithmetic |
| Max pain | 7,700.00 | 7,710 | Today’s expiring contract, and the only same-date series on the board. The magnet sits 11.76 points under cash and four points over the futures price — the closest the two have been all month. It recomputes through the session and should be read as a roughly fifteen-point zone, not a line, and it stops existing at 4:00 p.m. |
| Put wall · floor | 7,700.00 | 7,710 | Same strike as max pain for a second consecutive session, carrying about 58,956 puts and the peak put gamma. This is the level that has to fail for the session to have a downside at all, and Cannon’s S1 at 7,695.17 sits fifteen points beneath it in futures terms — the first structure underneath if it does. It is also the one level on this table the nearest-dated books do not corroborate |
| Gamma flip | 7,659.69 | 7,670 | Cash closed 52.07 points above the boundary, so the tape opens in the dampened regime. This is the line the whole letter turns on: below it, dealer hedging amplifies moves instead of absorbing them. Cannon’s S2 is 7,668.08 — 1.85 points from the flip in futures terms, arrived at from Friday’s high, low and close rather than from open interest |
Gamma levels from a public dealer-gamma (GEX) model, computed on the August 28 close. Max pain is a live calculation and moves during the session.
The ceiling is corroborated. The floor is not.
Aggregate levels are built across every expiration at once, which can leave a published level standing on contracts that are months away. Read the near-dated books on their own and the two ends of this map come apart.
Above the market they agree. In the September monthly S&P index chain the heaviest call open interest above the market sits at 7,800 — roughly 46,700 contracts, with the next line down at 7,750 carrying about 29,000 — the same strike as the published ceiling, reached from a single expiration rather than from all of them. Today’s expiring E-mini series says the same thing from a different angle: its call open interest stacks at the converted price of that ceiling and above it, and thins out quickly underneath.
Underneath the market they do not agree. In that same September chain the put open interest does not concentrate at the wall. It sits a hundred points lower, in a shelf running 7,550 to 7,600 that carries roughly 46,000 and 55,500 contracts against about 39,000 at 7,700. Today’s expiring E-mini series puts its weight lower still, on 7,650 and 7,680 in futures terms — two strikes carrying together more than six times the put open interest on the wall’s own price.
Two things follow, and neither of them changes the published map. The first is that the ceiling has independent support and the floor is a level the aggregate produces rather than one the near book defends — which matters most on the single day when the near book is the expiring book. The second is a range: today’s expiring E-mini series prices an implied move of roughly ±32 points, putting the session’s expected band at about 7,671 to 7,735 in futures. The lower end of that band is the gamma flip, to within a point. The option market’s own arithmetic says a one-standard-deviation down day reaches the regime boundary and stops there.
What Cannon’s own levels say
The convergence at the top and bottom of this range is unusual enough to be worth stating plainly. Cannon’s R2 at 7,809.58 sits two-thirds of a point from the call wall expressed in futures. Cannon’s S2 at 7,668.08 sits under two points from the gamma flip expressed in futures. One method uses Friday’s high, low and close and nothing else. The other uses open interest across four expirations and nothing else. They have independently marked the same ceiling and the same regime boundary, and the distance between those two prices — roughly 141 points in futures — is the range both systems say today lives inside.
Inside it, the picture is less comfortable. ES is 32.6 points below the daily pivot of 7,738.83, having settled Friday 16.8 under it. Price has spent the whole overnight session on the wrong side of equilibrium and made its low at 7,683.75 — between S1 and S2 — before recovering. The upside levels are correspondingly far away: R1 at 7,765.92 is sixty points up and, unlike R2, has no option structure behind it at all.
The other board has already broken. WTI is trading above Cannon’s R3 for crude at 85.54; R1 was 84.01, R2 was 84.66, and all three were taken out overnight, leaving the pivot at 83.13 three and a half dollars below the market. When a pivot ladder is cleared end to end before the New York open, the arithmetic has no further levels to offer for the day — the market has left the range the prior session defined. The equity board has not even reached its own S1.
Trend and structure
Cannon’s trend column is more mixed than the price action suggests. Both index contracts carry long-term up arrows and no short-term signal — the E-mini’s fifty-two-week high of 7,838.50 is 1.7% above this morning’s futures price and twenty-eight points above the call wall in futures terms, so the record high and the top of the option map remain effectively the same place. Gold and silver still carry up arrows on both horizons despite Friday’s declines, which is the board saying the metals selloff has not broken anything structural yet. The thirty-year bond shows short-term up against long-term down; live cattle is again the only row pointing down on both.
Two rows the equity reader will skip: wheat settled up 3.36% Friday and cocoa up 6.47%, the two largest single-day moves on the entire board and larger than anything in the metals selloff. Soft commodities are moving on their own supply stories at the same moment energy is repricing on a supply story of its own. Whatever Tuesday’s ISM Prices Paid prints, the raw-material side of the input-cost equation has been going one way for a week.
Two banks flipped to two hikes over the weekend, and Goldman is standing alone on the other side
Hatzius calls Friday’s address the most hawkish Warsh has delivered as chairman — and then refuses to move. His formulation is conditional and worth quoting precisely: the speech “opens the door to a September hike, but only if the upcoming August CPI and PPI reports surprise to the upside.” Goldman’s own forecast has core CPI and core PCE running at roughly 0.2% month over month in August, which is not an upside surprise, and on that basis the house call remains a hold in September.
That leaves Goldman as the only tier-A desk actively fading the market’s pricing. The distinction he is drawing is the one the price is glossing over: Warsh described a standard for acting, not an intention to act. Everything now depends on two prints that have not happened.
Reported by Reuters at 12:29 a.m. Eastern this morning: Barclays now expects a 25 basis point hike in September and another in December. The firm had previously expected no change at all this year. That is a two-hike reversal from an unchanged baseline inside a single weekend, and Reuters attributes it to the firm rather than to a named strategist, so it is carried here as a house view.
Deutsche Bank told CNBC that Warsh “surprised us… with its lean in a decidedly hawkish direction,” and now looks for 50 basis points of hikes this year, September and December. Two of the largest rates shops on the Street arrived at the identical new forecast over the same weekend, from different starting points. When the sell side converges that fast, the interesting question stops being whether they are right and becomes what happens to positioning if they are wrong — which is Hatzius’ entire argument.
Speaking on CNBC after the speech, Pies put September hike odds at roughly 30% a month ago against near 60% today — a read that matched the CME curve almost exactly — and disclosed that his firm has acted on it. 3Fourteen has cut equities from overweight to benchmark weight, taking profit on the bull-market overweight rather than turning bearish, and has moved from underweight cash to overweight cash.
His stated expectation is further equity weakness into the next CPI, PPI and payrolls prints, and a September hike if the inflation data and oil hold where they are. That second condition is the one that changed over the weekend: crude is up 3.7% this morning. He is the only voice on this roster whose call and whose book have moved together and in advance.
Chronert’s year-end S&P target stands at 8,100, raised from 7,700 in June on AI-driven earnings, and he has not changed it. What he has changed is the composition underneath it. He is cutting the tech overweight to neutral into the third quarter after a strong semiconductor and hardware second quarter, while lifting software from underweight to market weight — a net-neutral position on the sector assembled out of two opposite moves.
His caution is aimed at the other side of the market: the “broadening” trade beyond mega-cap AI is, in his framing, the part most sensitive to a hike, and he wants rate-hike odds priced back out before he will trust a soft landing. Those odds have risen every session since he said it.
Pasquariello’s desk view, relayed on CNBC, is the flow counterweight to everything above. Underlying fund flows remain solid; corporates and households are still on the bid; and the levered community has ratcheted down exposure between now and the first meaningful wave of new issuance in September. His conclusion from that combination is that the technicals support a continued grind higher.
Read against Section 02, it is a coherent argument: it is precisely because the fast money has already de-risked that a hawkish repricing has produced a quarter-percent index decline rather than a rout. It is also a trade with a shelf life he named himself — the issuance wave he is pointing at starts this week.
“I don’t see the case for a rate increase here.” Matus’ objection is mechanical rather than dovish: nothing currently driving inflation is rate-sensitive, so a hike is in his word “performative” — it lands on lower-income borrowers rather than on artificial-intelligence capital spending, which is not financed at the short end. His evidence that the speech failed on its own terms is that ten-year yields rose after it, which is not what a credible hawkish signal is supposed to produce.
His warning is about the transmission channel nobody models: consumer sentiment is already low, and it has held up mainly because the equity market has. If equities break, sentiment breaks with them, and the inflation expectations that have stayed contained for years break last.
Siegel called Warsh “more hawkish than I expected,” but his reading of the bond market cut the other way: he noted the two-year rose more than the ten-year and took the resulting flattening as evidence that markets are gaining confidence the Fed can control inflation. Friday’s numbers support him — the two-year added fourteen basis points against the ten-year’s six.
This morning the trade is going the other way: the two-year is down 2.9 basis points and 2s10s has steepened to +40.3 bp. His second point is the one to hold onto. He describes the recent Nasdaq high as a “durable ceiling” that has to break for a real second-half advance, and calls everything below it an overhang.
“What we got today is a clear message the economy is doing well.” El-Erian’s point is that this was a growth statement rather than a policy commitment, and that the speech alone is not enough to guarantee a September hike: Warsh recommitted to the 2% target, but also called inflation expectations stable and spent real time on the longer-term productivity case for artificial intelligence. Two of those three things argue for patience.
The roster, and where it has landed
| Voice | Firm | Stance | Where it stands this morning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan Hatzius | Goldman Sachs | HOLD SEPT | The only tier-A desk fading the market’s hike pricing, and the condition is explicit. Section 05 |
| Barclays | house view | +50 BP 2026 | Reversed from no change all year to September and December. Section 05 |
| Deutsche Bank | house view | +50 BP 2026 | Same new forecast as Barclays, reached over the same weekend from a different starting point. Section 05 |
| Warren Pies | 3Fourteen Research | BENCHMARK | The only voice on this roster whose book has moved with the call. Section 05 |
| Tony Pasquariello | Goldman Sachs | CONSTRUCTIVE | The flow counterweight to the whole hawkish repricing, with a shelf life he named himself. Section 05 |
| Scott Chronert | Citi | 8,100 | Target held; the change is underneath it, in the sector book. Section 05 |
| Ed Yardeni | Yardeni Research | BULL 8,400 | Holding the number through the repricing, on the earnings rather than the discount rate. Section 07 |
| Savita Subramanian | Bank of America | BEAR 7,100 | Street-low target restated Friday. Her 2026 EPS was lifted to $345 from $335 in July — the bearishness is about the multiple, not the earnings |
| Drew Matus | MetLife IM | NO HIKE | Objects on transmission grounds, not dovish ones. Section 05 |
| Mohamed El-Erian | Allianz | NEUT | The speech alone does not guarantee September. Section 05 |
| Jeremy Siegel | Wharton | CAUT | Reads the recent Nasdaq high as the level that decides the second half. Section 05 |
| Michael Hartnett | Bank of America | CAUT | Friday’s Flow Show put the Breadth Rule at 82% of global indices overbought against an 88% sell trigger — nearing, not at. Published before the keynote, so not a reaction to it |
| Tom Lee | Fundstrat | BULL 8,000 | End-August window graded MISS in Section 02. His standing August–October drawdown warning of 10–20% is the part that now carries |
| Jonathan Krinsky | BTIG | BEAR | Seasonal-peak call graded OPEN in Section 02; the window runs to October 11. No citable note for a seventh consecutive run |
| Max Kettner | HSBC | CAUT | His own timer expires today — on July 21 he said he would take his foot off the gas in “a month, month and a half.” No new note to confirm he has |
| Rick Rieder | BlackRock | BULL | Said on August 7 that a hike was unlikely. The curve now makes it the base case. The most offside standing call on this roster |
| Mike Wilson | Morgan Stanley | CAUT 7,800 | His named near-term risk was oil rising. It is up 3.7% this morning. No new note since August 24 |
| Helima Croft | RBC Capital Markets | CAUT | Her standing supply-loss estimate is the most load-bearing carried number on this roster this morning. Section 03 |
| Scott Rubner | Citadel Securities | DARK | Nothing published since August 11, when he warned that “if August turns into a chase, some of today’s buying capacity will already have been deployed.” August ends today |
Two seats carried on this roster are now confirmed vacant: Christopher Harvey left Wells Fargo in August 2025 and the equity strategy seat there is held by Ohsung Kwon; Steven Major left HSBC in December 2025. Jonathan Golub is at Seaport Research Partners, not UBS. No call is attributed to any of the three.
A speech with a standard in it and no decision, and a market that supplied the decision itself
Start with what Warsh actually said, because the gap between the text and the price is the largest single fact in this letter. On his hundredth day as chair he told Jackson Hole that inflation is running above target “so the Fed’s predominant focus right now should be on prices,” and that while the summer’s PCE and CPI readings were better than expected, “they do not tell me that underlying trends have meaningfully improved.” He said he would be “hard pressed to describe broad financial conditions as restrictive.” Then he closed the door on the thing everyone wanted: “I stand here today committed to a discipline, not to a decision,” adding of the framework he had just laid out, “just don’t call it forward guidance.”
The numbers he brought were the hawkish part. Headline PCE at 3.7% year over year and 4.1% on a six-month annualised basis. And of the 199 components in the PCE basket, 54% are running above 3% against roughly 32% across the two decades before the pandemic — the single most damaging statistic in the speech, because it says the inflation is broad rather than concentrated in a few lines that can be argued away. Against that he put unemployment at 4.1%, which he called consistent with full employment, equipment and intangibles investment growing about 9% over four quarters, and S&P 500 profits up more than 20%. His verdict on his own institution was blunt: responsibility for sixty-five months of elevated inflation “sits squarely with the central bank.”
Three officials already voted for a hike at the July 28–29 meeting. Chicago’s Austan Goolsbee, at the symposium, welcomed Warsh’s use of money-supply growth and commodity prices as inputs because it stopped short of a mechanical formula, and agreed the labour half of the mandate is stable while the problem half has been inflation. That is a dove endorsing the framework without endorsing the outcome — the same distinction Hatzius is trading.
The bond market’s answer was fast and lopsided. The two-year added fourteen basis points on the session against the ten-year’s six and the thirty-year’s three. That is a front-end repricing of the policy path rather than a term-premium event, and it is why the Russell fell five times as much as the S&P. This morning the front end is giving some of it back while crude is up nearly four percent — a curve that has stopped being sure. Ed Yardeni, who has held his 8,400 target throughout, put the equity case in one line: “we doubt that one or two Fed rate hikes will derail our target,” with forward earnings at a record $396.05.
Two things outside the United States belong in the same frame. China’s official manufacturing PMI printed 49.8 against 49.7 expected and 49.2 prior — a beat, and a second month in contraction, with new orders jumping to 50.6 from 48.5 while employment slipped to 48.7. And in Japan the ten-year JGB touched 2.95%, a roughly thirty-year high, with dollar-yen having surrendered most of the gains from July’s intervention. Treasury Secretary Bessent called the yen’s moves “pretty contained” on Sunday and said he expects the Bank of Japan to do the right thing — Washington signalling it would prefer BoJ tightening to another intervention, which lowers near-term intervention risk and raises the stakes on the September 17–18 BoJ meeting for anyone funding in yen.
A utility repricing on a legislative deadline, and the AI complex’s next referendum on Wednesday night
The largest single-name moves this morning are not in technology. PG&E is down 15.96% pre-market at 13.95 and Edison International down 10.57% at 62.75, after California lawmakers formally rejected Governor Newsom’s proposal to end subrogation — the mechanism that lets insurers recover wildfire losses from utilities — ahead of the legislative session deadline, which is today. PG&E had already fallen about 7.4% on Friday on the same story. Mizuho cut it to Neutral with a target of 16 from 21; BMO moved to Market Perform at 21 from 28. This is a policy event with a hard date on it, and the date is the session you are trading.
The leadership this morning is energy, mechanically. Chevron is up 2.30% at 206.51 after closing Friday at 201.86, tracking crude rather than any company news, and the complex around it — Exxon, ConocoPhillips, Shell, BP — is moving with the same input. That is the only sector this morning whose bid has an identifiable cause.
Aon confirmed a definitive agreement to acquire USI Insurance Services from KKR for $17.0 billion in cash, or $16.7 billion net of roughly $278 million of tax attributes, per the merger agreement filed this morning. USI carries about $3 billion of annual revenue and around 11,000 staff; the deal is expected to close in the fourth quarter. Worth noting for anyone trading the headline: Aon is flat pre-market. The move happened Friday, on the leak.
Two dates to have in the book. Today is Tim Cook’s last day as Apple’s chief executive; John Ternus takes over tomorrow, September 1, with Cook becoming executive chairman — the handover is Tuesday, not today. And Wednesday after the close brings Broadcom, on consensus of $3.24 in earnings on $29.4 billion of revenue, up 91.7% and 84.9% year over year, against an average price target of $525.97 with the stock still roughly 7% lower year to date. King Lip of Baker Avenue Wealth Management called it his firm’s “top pick for the next evolution in custom AI chips” on Friday afternoon. Susquehanna’s Christopher Rolland expects slightly better results and guidance on AI networking and software strength, while flagging tightening advanced-node supply. Between now and then, Dell and Palo Alto report Tuesday night.
Friday’s tape is worth carrying for one reason: it was violently two-sided under a quarter-percent index decline. Elastic rose 24.3% on a beat and a raise; Gap rose 14.3%; Affirm added 10.2%. Against that, PayPal fell 11.1% when the reported Stripe and Advent takeout was called off, Marvell lost 7.8%, CrowdStrike gave back 6.4% of the prior week’s twenty-percent post-earnings move, and biotech fell 3.41% as a group. Dispersion at that level inside a flat index is the mechanical expression of the breadth data in Section 02.
Four days of speakers, then silence through the data that decides it
The September 16 meeting prices at 59.9% hike, 40.1% hold and 0.0% cut on CME FedWatch, read this morning — up from 57.0% Friday and 41.4% a week ago. Cut probability is zero at this meeting and the next.
Watch items this week, in order of consequence: ISM Prices Paid Tuesday at a consensus of 72.0 against 71.1, the first read on whether crude reaches input costs; Governor Waller Thursday at 08:30, speaking at the same minute as jobless claims and the trade balance; Cleveland’s Hammack Thursday at 15:00; and August payrolls Friday at 08:30, consensus +45,000 against a prior of −23,000, with unemployment expected to tick up to 4.2%.
Blackout begins Saturday, September 5. Waller and Hammack are the last live Fed voices before the vote. The key quote remains the one the whole week is being traded against: “I stand here today committed to a discipline, not to a decision.”
The closer
The hike is priced on data that prints where the Fed cannot answer it
Sequencing is doing more work here than anyone is acknowledging. The market has moved from 41.4% to a hike-as-base-case on a speech that explicitly declined to commit, and the sell side has followed — two houses reversing to two hikes over one weekend. But Goldman’s condition for changing its own hold call is an upside surprise in the August CPI and PPI, and those prints land in the window that opens after blackout begins Saturday. From September 5 to the meeting on the 16th there is no official who can push back on a mispricing, in either direction, whatever the inflation data says.
Which means the entire policy debate compresses into four business days: ISM Tuesday, ADP and the Beige Book Wednesday, Waller and Hammack Thursday, payrolls Friday. After that the market talks to itself for eleven days holding a probability it inferred rather than one it was given. Positioning that assumes the Fed will clarify before the vote is positioning against the calendar.
One of Cannon’s two boards has already broken, and it is not the one being watched
The equity pivot ladder is intact and unremarkable: ES has not reached its own S1, and the pivot sits thirty-two points above. Nothing has been resolved. The crude ladder no longer exists — WTI cleared R1, R2 and R3 in a single overnight session, leaving the pivot three and a half dollars below the market with no further resistance level to offer for the day.
That asymmetry is the trade nobody is framing. Equity risk is being priced as though the weekend was a headline; energy is being priced as though it was a supply event. Gold down, the two-year down and the dollar down say the same thing from the other direction — nothing is being bought as a systemic hedge. If the crude board is right and the equity board is late, the transmission is not the equity market repricing risk. It is ISM Prices Paid on Tuesday morning, and then a Fed that has just named prices its predominant focus.
The mechanism that has produced twenty-two quiet sessions expires at four o’clock
One strike is max pain, the put wall, the peak call gamma and the peak put gamma simultaneously — four jobs on a contract with hours of life left. It is what has kept the S&P from a one-percent down day for twenty-two sessions, and it dies at this afternoon’s close, in the same hour as a month-end rebalance following a fifth consecutive up month in the Dow.
And it is the least-defended of the four levels on the map: the near-dated books put their put mass fifty to a hundred points lower, so what expires this afternoon is a magnet rather than a cushion. Tuesday then opens on a thinner book with the flip the next real structure beneath — thirty-six points down in futures terms — into ISM, into a Broadcom print Wednesday night, into payrolls Friday. The option market is charging an IV rank of 7.69%, the fifth percentile, with implied volatility at 11.86% against 11.72% realised. It is pricing next week to look like last week at almost precisely the moment the reason last week looked that way stops existing.
eli@cannontrading.com · cannontrading.com
Legal Disclosure & Risk Warning — Cannon Trading Company
This publication is provided by Cannon Trading Company for informational and educational purposes only. Content may include market commentary, technical observations, analyst opinions, and aggregated material derived from publicly available sources. While such information is believed to be reliable, Cannon Trading Company does not author, independently verify, endorse, or guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of any third-party information referenced or summarized herein.
The information, opinions, market data, and commentary contained in this publication are subject to change at any time without notice and do not constitute investment advice, a solicitation, or a recommendation to buy or sell any security, futures contract, option on futures, foreign currency transaction, or any other financial instrument.
Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Trading Futures, Options on Futures, retail off-exchange foreign currency transactions, and other derivatives involves substantial risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. You may lose all or more than your initial investment. Carefully consider whether trading is appropriate for you in light of your experience, objectives, financial resources, and other relevant circumstances.
Cannon Trading Company does not guarantee any profits and makes no representation that the strategies, ideas, analyses, or information presented will result in profitable trades or avoid losses. Any market views, analyst calls, forecasts, or third-party commentary referenced reflect the opinions of their respective authors and may or may not align with the views of Cannon Trading Company.
HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS HAVE MANY INHERENT LIMITATIONS, SOME OF WHICH ARE DESCRIBED BELOW. NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT ANY ACCOUNT WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THOSE SHOWN. IN FACT, THERE ARE FREQUENTLY SHARP DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS AND THE ACTUAL RESULTS SUBSEQUENTLY ACHIEVED BY ANY PARTICULAR TRADING PROGRAM.
ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS IS THAT THEY ARE GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. IN ADDITION, HYPOTHETICAL TRADING DOES NO INVOLVE FINACIAL RISK, AND NO HYPOTHETICAL TRADING RECORD CAN COMPLETLEY ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL RISK IN ACTUAL TRADING. FOR EXAMPLE, THE ABILITY TO WITHSTAND LOSSES OR TO ADHERE TO A PARTICULAR TRADING PROGRAM IN SPITE OF TRADING LOSSES ARE MATERIAL POINTS WHICH CAN ALSO ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS. THERE ARE NUMEROUS OTHER FACTORS RELATED TO THE MARKETS IN GENERAL OR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ANY SPECIFIC TRADING PROGRAM WHICH CANNOT BE FULLY ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE PREPARATION OF HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS AND ALL OF WHICH CAN ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS.
Cannon Trading Company is registered solely as a commodities broker. Nothing contained herein constitutes the provision of investment advisory services.
© 2026 Cannon Trading Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
cannontrading.com • 1-800-454-9572 • (310) 859-9572