FOMC Convenes Today — Oil Reverses Monday’s Relief Rally
Tuesday Morning Brief — March 17, 2026
Monday's optimism has a short shelf life. The tentative relief that came with reports of tankers "dribbling through" the Strait of Hormuz reversed overnight, with Brent crude surging 4% back above $103 and WTI jumping 4.2% to $97 per barrel as of early morning Tuesday. The catalyst is straightforward and unflattering: the coalition Trump promised to announce this week is not materializing on the timetable the market hoped for.
Germany has ruled out participating. Japan says no decision has been made. The EU foreign policy chief said there is "no appetite" across the 27 member states to join. France has an aircraft carrier in the Eastern Mediterranean but in a defensive posture. And U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright told CNBC last week that the Navy is simply "not ready" to escort tankers yet. Meanwhile, a missile struck Abu Dhabi overnight, killing a Pakistani national after air defense interception — a reminder that the ground situation remains actively escalatory even as diplomats talk.
The equities market is nonetheless holding its composure. The S&P 500 rose 0.5%, the Nasdaq 0.4%, and the Dow 329 points on Monday, building on the gap-up open. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, and JPMorgan have all published notes in the past 24 hours maintaining broadly constructive views on U.S. equities, pointing to earnings growth and valuations that are less stretched than before the war began. That bullish equities / bearish oil dynamic — where stocks hold up even as crude lurches — is the defining tension of this market right now.
And then there is Nvidia. Jensen Huang's GTC keynote on Monday delivered the most bullish AI demand signal of the year: $1 trillion in projected revenue from Blackwell and Vera Rubin combined through 2027, doubling his prior estimate of $500 billion. Goldman Sachs maintained a Buy rating on the stock immediately following the keynote. Shares rose 2% Monday and are trading with a positive bias this morning. The AI narrative is back. The question is whether it can coexist with a geopolitical energy shock and a Fed that has no room to ease.
Overnight Key Numbers — Tuesday Pre-Market
S&P 500 (Cash)
6,732.54 ▲ +0.49%
Mon close +1.01%; 2-day rally holding above 6,700 — key support level
Nasdaq 100
+0.4% Mon Close
Semis leading; NVDA +2% Monday on GTC; Intel +6.29%, Micron +6.20%
Dow Jones
47,348.84 ▲ +0.86%
+329 pts Monday close; second straight positive session; holding 47K
WTI Crude ▼ Reversal
~$97.08
+4.2% overnight reversal; gave back all of Monday’s -5.28% relief decline; coalition stalling
Brent Crude ▼ Reversal
~$103.65
+4.0% reversal; back above $103; "mixed messages" driving uncertainty
Natural Gas
~$3.09
Flat to slight pullback; less Iran-direct exposure than crude
Gold ↔ Watch
~$5,025
Near historic highs; dollar strength capping gains ahead of Fed; safe haven bid resurfacing
Silver
~$81.25
Tracking gold; modest bid; industrial demand offset by growth concerns
10-Year Treasury ↔ Watch
4.23–4.24%
Steady after Monday’s -6bp drop; markets pricing one cut by Dec; back to flat as oil reverses
2-Year Treasury
~3.43%
2s10s spread ~+80 bps; steepening reflects stagflation premium; Sept cut at 52% per CME
DXY Dollar Index
~99.58–100.01
Consolidating below 100 resistance; bulls stalled at 100.16/34 — key technical level
VIX ↔ Watch
~23.51 Prev Close
Stabilizing after Monday’s -12.76% collapse; oil reversal could push back toward 25+
Bitcoin ▲ Breakout
$75,176
+4% from $72,625 yesterday; testing pivotal resistance 74,434–76,159; 8-day rally off lows
EUR/USD
Consolidating
RBA hiked overnight adding global tightening signal; EUR holding; watch 1.09
USD/JPY ↔ Watch
Bearish signal near 160
Bearish USD/JPY technical signal emerging; yen gaining; watch for carry unwind implications
Sources: Yahoo Finance, Investing.com, CBOE, Coinbase, TradingEconomics, Barchart — pre-market Tuesday March 17
⚓ Strait of Hormuz Status Tracker — Tuesday March 17
Coalition Progress
Germany out. Japan: no decision. EU: "no appetite." France: defensive posture only. Trump: announcement "coming soon." Reality: no country publicly committed.
Tanker Traffic
Kevin Hassett (White House): "tankers starting to dribble through." First non-Iranian Aframax cargo transited with AIS on Sunday. India awaiting confirmation for 22 ships. Partial, selective, fragile.
Escalation Risk
Missile intercepted over Abu Dhabi overnight. Trump weighing Kharg Island seizure — "boots on the ground" scenario. U.S. strikes on Iranian anti-ship positions continuing daily.
Iran Position
Iran FM: "Strait open to enemies' enemies only." Iraq mediating with Tehran. One Iranian official: may allow passage if oil traded in Chinese yuan, not dollars. Iran still exporting ~1.5M bpd through strait.
This Week’s Critical Events — Everything Remaining
Tier 1 — Big Bank Equity Strategy Desks
Goldman Sachs — Morgan Stanley — JPMorgan New: Constructive Despite War
In a notable collective signal published on Bloomberg Monday, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, and JPMorgan have all moved to maintain constructive views on U.S. equities despite the Iran war risks. ▲ SENTIMENT SHIFT from the prior week's defensive positioning: all three strategists are now pointing to support from earnings growth and equity valuations that, while still elevated, are meaningfully less stretched than they were before the conflict began. The S&P 500 has held within 5% of its all-time high through three weeks of war — a resilience signal that all three banks are citing as their anchor for the constructive case.
The shared thesis: oil isn't rallying because the world has run out of barrels. It's rallying because markets are pricing geopolitical risk. And unless that risk turns into actual, sustained disruption, the insurance premium tends to expire. The fundamental oil picture — OPEC+ supply rising, a sizable 2026 surplus building — supports a view that Brent's fair value, absent the war, is closer to $65 than $100. The spread between current prices and fair value is entirely a geopolitical risk premium.
Goldman Sachs GTC Buy Rating Maintained
Goldman maintained its Buy rating on Nvidia immediately following Monday's GTC keynote, citing Huang's $1 trillion revenue projection through 2027 as a confirmation of the AI infrastructure buildout thesis. The bank's broader macro framework remains: first rate cut pushed to September, recession probability at 25%, and Brent forecast at $71 by Q4 — if Hormuz reopens. Goldman's updated inflation forecast for 2026 is expected to revise to approximately 3.5% at Wednesday's FOMC, per their preview note — a level that makes any first-half rate relief effectively impossible.
Morgan Stanley — Mike Wilson 6-Month Constructive
Mike Wilson published a note this week titled "The Reasons for the Bull Market to Resume," making the case that in six months, things will likely have settled down — drawing a parallel to how oil stabilized after Russia invaded Ukraine. His central argument is notable: the spike in oil prices is the result of a logistical logjam in the Straits of Hormuz rather than a shortage of supply. The supply is there. The problem is a temporary physical blockage. And as he put it, "necessity is the mother of ingenuity and will likely be solved."
“The spike in oil prices is the result of a logistical logjam in the Straits of Hormuz rather than a shortage of supply. That logjam is a real constraint, but necessity is the mother of ingenuity and will likely be solved.”
Mike Wilson, Morgan Stanley CIO & Chief U.S. Equity StrategistWilson also flagged a second reason for six-month optimism: the broadening in earnings growth. A trend that remains intact and was a key call in the 2026 outlook. Critically, he points out that the U.S. is far more resilient than Asia and Europe to an oil shock, given its energy independence. His 7,800 S&P 500 year-end target remains in place.
Bank of America Hawkish Inflation Warning
BofA economist Antonio Gabriel delivered one of the sharpest warnings circulating this morning. In a note published Monday as the FOMC began convening, Gabriel wrote that perhaps hawkish inflation calls are overcrowding the picture when it comes to the Fed's path forward — but with a twist. His argument is not that the Fed will cut. It's that markets may actually be underpricing how protracted the war could become.
“While a quick resolution to the conflict is certainly a possibility, we view the conflict extending into Q2 as an equally likely outcome, and a more protracted war cannot be ruled out. To assume the Fed won’t cut is based on the assumption that geopolitical tensions are transitory — and that inflation may be a relatively short to medium-term hiccup.”
Antonio Gabriel, BofA Global Research — Published TodayThe implication: the market is simultaneously underpricing the growth damage from a prolonged war AND underpricing the inflation persistence. That combination — lower growth and higher inflation persisting longer — is the textbook stagflation scenario that no bank's base case fully models.
JPMorgan & Goldman on Fed Projections Dot Plot Preview
Analysts at both JPMorgan and Goldman Sachs, cited this morning in a widely read preview note, suggest the Fed will likely revise its year-end 2026 inflation forecast upward to approximately 3.5% at Wednesday's meeting. If that projection materializes in the dot plot, it would effectively erase the possibility of any rate relief in the first half of the year and push the first cut firmly into Q4 at the earliest. This is the number to watch on Wednesday more than the rate decision itself.
Tier 2 — Independent & Macro Strategists
FOMC Preview — Conference Board Detailed Dot Plot Call
The Conference Board published their FOMC preview this week with the most detailed publicly available dot plot projection. Their call: the FOMC statement will likely note significant geopolitical risks to the economic outlook and inflation, using language akin to the statement issued shortly after Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022. The Summary of Economic Projections will show downward revisions to GDP and upward revisions to inflation — with inflation revised more significantly than GDP is downgraded. The dot plot itself is expected to continue showing one 25-basis-point cut in each of 2026 and 2027, "amid increased uncertainty surrounding the outlook." The Conference Board still expects two cuts in 2026, but the timing is uncertain.
Kevin Hassett — White House Economic Adviser
Hassett made the most market-moving administration comment of the morning on CNBC. Speaking live on Tuesday, he reaffirmed the Trump administration's position that the war will be over in weeks, not months — while providing the first substantive ground-truth update on Hormuz transit. His exact characterization: tankers are "starting to dribble through the straits." He attributed this to Iran running low on capacity rather than to any diplomatic breakthrough. Separately, Hassett flagged a concern that markets have not priced: Asian nations may be pulling back refined oil exports to the U.S. to ensure their own supply, tightening the domestic energy supply picture in ways that are independent of the Hormuz situation.
“Already you’re seeing tankers are starting to dribble through the straits, and I think it’s a sign of how little Iran has left. We’re very optimistic that this is going to be over in the short run.”
Kevin Hassett, White House Economic Adviser — CNBC Tuesday MorningScott Bessent — U.S. Treasury Secretary
Bessent, speaking from Paris where he is conducting trade talks with Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng, made four significant statements Monday that are still reverberating this morning. First: the U.S. is allowing Iranian oil tankers to pass through Hormuz, framing this as a supply-stabilization measure. Second: oil prices should fall "much lower" than $80 per barrel when the war ends. Third: he threw cold water on market rumors about administration intervention in oil futures trading, saying explicitly that Treasury has not done that and has no authority to do so. Fourth: the planned Trump-Xi summit has been formally postponed as Trump seeks clarity on whether China will help reopen Hormuz.
Stacy Rasgon — Bernstein Research Semis / AI — GTC Reaction
Bernstein's top semiconductor analyst is among the most closely tracked voices following yesterday's GTC keynote. Rasgon's framework for the Nvidia thesis has been consistently bullish on AI infrastructure demand, and Monday's $1 trillion revenue projection from Huang directly validates the demand side of that thesis. The key question Bernstein is watching: whether the Vera Rubin delivery timeline holds as smoothly as Huang indicated (first system already running in Microsoft Azure), or whether supply chain constraints create the same initial turbulence that Grace Blackwell sampling experienced. Huang acknowledged on stage that Grace Blackwell sampling had issues, but said Vera Rubin sampling is going smoothly.
Special Coverage — Nvidia GTC 2026 Day 1 Recap
Monday's GTC keynote from Jensen Huang was, by the measure of any prior conference, the most bullish AI demand statement ever made from a corporate stage. The headline number: Nvidia now sees at least $1 trillion in combined revenue from Blackwell and Vera Rubin chip sales through 2027 — a direct doubling of the $500 billion figure Huang cited at GTC in 2025. The upgrade was not a forecast revision in the usual sense. It was the CEO of the world's most important AI infrastructure company standing in front of 30,000 developers and telling the world that demand has far exceeded even his own prior expectations.
The Vera Rubin platform was the technical centerpiece. Built on TSMC's 3nm process with 336 billion transistors and HBM4 memory delivering 22 TB/s of bandwidth, Vera Rubin delivers 10 times the inference throughput per watt compared to Blackwell, and trains large mixture-of-experts models with one-quarter the GPU count. Microsoft Azure is already running the first Vera Rubin NVL72 system. The Groq LPU integration — from the startup Nvidia acquired for $20 billion in December — adds 35x tokens-per-watt performance on top of Rubin GPUs. Huang also unveiled the next platform after Rubin: Feynman, targeted for 2028, and suggested the company's ambitions extend to orbital data centers and AI space infrastructure.
“At this time last year, we saw $500 billion in high-confidence demand for Blackwell and Rubin through 2026. Right here where I stand, I see through 2027, at least $1 trillion.”
Jensen Huang, CEO Nvidia — GTC 2026 Keynote, March 16, 2026The market implications extend well beyond Nvidia itself. The $1 trillion order book through 2027 is a demand signal for every company in the AI supply chain: TSMC, SK Hynix, Samsung, copper and fiber interconnect providers, liquid cooling specialists, and the hyperscalers — Microsoft, Meta, Google, Amazon — who are the primary buyers. Goldman Sachs maintained its Buy rating immediately post-keynote. Nvidia shares rose 2% Monday and closed firmly in the green after touching $188 intraday. The stock had entered GTC down 3.35% year-to-date; the keynote appears to be resetting that narrative.
Tier 4 — Sentiment, Fear & Flow Gauges
CNN Fear & Greed
Fear Zone
Moved out of Extreme Fear after Monday’s rally; oil reversal overnight could push back. Watch closely at open.
VIX
~23.51
Prev close 23.51; oil +4% overnight likely pushes VIX back toward 25 at open today
WTI 1M Implied Vol
51%
Down from 68% war peak but 2x pre-war levels; oil reversal will spike this again today
Bitcoin
$75,176 ▲ +4%
8-day rally; testing critical 74,434–76,159 resistance; risk appetite leading indicator
S&P vs ATH
<5% Below
Remarkable resilience through 3 weeks of war; banks citing this as bull case anchor
Retail Sentiment SPY/QQQ
Extreme Bear
Crowd still positioned for more downside; historically contrarian bullish signal at this extreme
The sentiment picture this morning is more complex than Monday's clean relief rally suggested. Bitcoin's breakout toward $75,000 — up 14.5% from its monthly low over eight days — is the clearest positive risk-appetite signal in the market. Crypto tends to lead equity sentiment at inflection points, and the fact that BTC is testing a critical technical resistance zone rather than retreating is meaningful. However, the overnight oil reversal is the counterweight. A VIX that collapsed 12% on Monday will want to recover ground this morning as crude re-breaches $100. The Fed's two-day meeting has also begun, and the historical pattern is clear: markets tend to get more cautious in the 24 hours before a dot plot release, not less.
What Remains This Week
Everything that happens today is prologue. The FOMC convenes in Washington, and when Powell steps behind the lectern Wednesday at 2:30 PM Eastern, he will face the most scrutinized press conference of his career. The market has already priced a hold with near-certainty. What it has not priced is the tone. Three scenarios remain live, and they produce radically different market outcomes.
| Date & Time | Event | Heat |
|---|---|---|
| Tue Mar 17 All Day |
FOMC Day 1 + Nvidia GTC Day 2 — Committee deliberates; no public output. Watch oil reversal vs. equity resilience. Nvidia partner sessions; more AI demand data expected. | 🟡 Elevated |
| Wed Mar 18 8:30 AM ET |
February PPI — Energy component dramatically elevated; first data overlapping with war period. Goldman/JPM expect Fed to revise 2026 inflation to 3.5%. | 🔴 High |
| Wed Mar 18 2:00 PM ET |
FOMC Rate Decision + Dot Plot — 92%+ probability hold at 3.50–3.75%. The dot plot is the only thing that matters. Zero cuts = hawkish shock. One cut = Goldman base case. Two cuts = violent rally. | 🔴🔴 Critical |
| Wed Mar 18 2:30 PM ET |
Powell Press Conference — Two pressers left in Powell’s tenure. Does he say "transitory"? Does he validate the market’s one-cut base case? Kevin Warsh watches from the wings. | 🔴🔴 Critical |
| Thu Mar 19 8:30 AM ET |
Weekly Jobless Claims — Labor market data; watch for any post-war demand destruction signal in industrial hiring. | 🟡 Watch |
| All Week | Hormuz / Iran — Overrides everything. Kharg Island seizure decision, coalition announcement, tanker transit data. Each headline reprices the entire market. | 🔴🔴 Overrides All |
The three FOMC scenarios and their market implications deserve clear framing. A hawkish hold — where the dot plot shows zero cuts remaining in 2026 — would be a genuine shock. Yields would spike, growth stocks would sell off sharply, and oil's narrative would shift from inflationary risk to recessionary demand destruction. A neutral hold — one cut remaining, likely in December, language that acknowledges war risks without making promises — is the Goldman and Conference Board base case and would produce a mild relief rally that fades. A dovish hold — two cuts signaled, Powell soft on the inflation risk — is the least likely but most powerful outcome; it would trigger a violent unwind of defensive positioning, a dollar selloff, and potentially push BTC above $80,000.
Wildcards & Contrarian Flags
The Oil Reversal Nobody Talked About on Monday ▼ Overnight Change
Monday's gap-up relief rally was built on the perception that Hormuz was reopening. Tuesday morning's 4% crude reversal exposes how thin that perception was. No country has committed to the coalition. The Navy is not ready to escort tankers. Iran is still striking ships — Abu Dhabi was hit overnight. The "dribble" of tankers getting through is selective, Iranian-controlled, and fragile. The market's willingness to gap up on incomplete information is itself a risk signal: when reality re-asserts, the moves can be violent and fast.
Kharg Island: The Escalation Nobody Is Pricing Fully
Trump is actively weighing a seizure of Kharg Island — a move that would require U.S. boots on the ground and would immediately halt 90% of Iran's oil exports. The upside: an "economic knockout of the regime" that defunds Tehran and ends the war on Trump's terms. The downside: severe Iranian retaliation against Gulf energy infrastructure, potential strikes on Saudi Aramco facilities, and an oil spike to levels that would make $120 Brent look moderate. Goldman's pre-war Brent fair value was $65. An Oxford Economics scenario with infrastructure targeting puts Brent above $140. That scenario is not in any consensus model.
The Yuan Oil Trade: Iran’s Hidden Negotiating Chip
An Iranian official floated a remarkable condition for allowing broader tanker passage through Hormuz: oil cargoes must be traded in Chinese yuan, not U.S. dollars. This is not a minor diplomatic footnote. If implemented even partially, it would represent the most significant challenge to dollar oil pricing since 1973. The petroyuan scenario has been discussed for years in academic circles. An actual Iranian ultimatum to price oil in yuan, backed by the leverage of a Hormuz chokepoint, is a different category of market event entirely. No desk has adequately modeled what this means for DXY, Treasuries, or the global reserve currency system.
The AI / Oil Divergence Cannot Continue Indefinitely
Nvidia's $1 trillion GTC signal and the ongoing Iran energy shock represent two of the most powerful macro forces in the global economy — and they are currently pointing in opposite directions. The AI bull case requires sustained capex from hyperscalers who need stable economic conditions, cheap energy for data centers, and a Federal Reserve that is cutting rather than holding. The Iran oil shock threatens all three simultaneously. This divergence — AI is booming, energy is crashing the macro — cannot persist indefinitely. At some point, either the oil shock ends and the AI narrative reasserts dominance, or the oil shock deepens enough that AI capex gets reassessed. The resolution of this divergence is the most important medium-term market call of 2026.
Powell’s Incentive Structure Is Different From Any Prior Meeting
Jerome Powell has two pressers left. His term ends May 15. Kevin Warsh, viewed as hawkish on policy but potentially more open to financial innovation, waits to replace him. A Powell who leans dovish — describing the oil shock as transitory, signaling confidence in two cuts — would be at odds with the FOMC's hawkish lean but would be consistent with a Chair who wants to hand his successor a market that is stable rather than stressed. Conversely, a hawkish Powell who explicitly validates a no-cut 2026 scenario would be framing the challenge for Warsh in the starkest possible terms. The personal incentive structure of an outgoing chair has never been more complex. Markets are not pricing this dynamic at all.
The Bottom Line
The Macro Driver
The oil reversal this morning demonstrates that Monday’s relief was built on incomplete information. The Hormuz coalition does not exist yet. The war is ongoing. The Fed convenes today. The market is threading a needle between an AI boom that demands optimism and an energy shock that demands caution — and the needle gets harder to thread with each passing day.
The Binary Question
Does Powell describe the Iran oil shock as transitory on Wednesday? That single word — transitory — is the most market-consequential piece of language in the Federal Reserve’s vocabulary. If he uses it, risk-on. If he avoids it or explicitly rejects it, the dot plot’s implications become far more hawkish than any single number can convey.
Consensus Trade Posture
Stay long energy and AI infrastructure; reduce duration in fixed income ahead of Wednesday’s dot plot; maintain defensive quality bias in equities; do not chase Monday’s gap-up as today’s crude reversal confirms the relief was premature. Watch Powell’s press conference as the single most important market event of the week — and potentially of the quarter.
Legal Disclosure & Risk Warning
Cannon Trading Company — Pre-Market Briefing Disclosure
This Pre-Market Briefing is published by Cannon Trading Company for informational purposes only. The content contained herein is aggregated from publicly available sources across the internet, including but not limited to financial news websites, publicly accessible research summaries, social media platforms, and open-web publications. Cannon Trading Company does not author, verify, endorse, or guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or reliability of any third-party information reproduced or summarized in this briefing. All source material was publicly available at the time of aggregation. Cannon Trading Company assumes no responsibility for errors, omissions, or inaccuracies originating from third-party sources.
Trading Futures, Options on Futures, and retail off-exchange foreign currency transactions and other financial instruments involve substantial risk of loss and are not suitable for all investors. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Carefully consider if trading is suitable for you in light of your circumstances, knowledge, and financial resources. You may lose all or more of your initial investment.
The information, opinions, market data, commentary, and any references contained in this briefing are of opinion only, are subject to change at any time without notice, and do not constitute investment advice, a solicitation, or a recommendation to buy or sell any financial instrument or security. Cannon Trading Company does not guarantee any profits and makes no representation that the strategies, ideas, or information presented herein will result in profits or will not result in losses.
Cannon Trading Company is registered solely as a commodities broker. This briefing does not constitute the provision of investment advisory services. Any market views, analyst calls, strategist opinions, or third-party forecasts referenced in this briefing reflect the views of their respective authors and publishers, and not those of Cannon Trading Company.
Past results are not necessarily indicative of future results. The risk of loss in futures trading can be substantial. Carefully consider the inherent risks of such an investment in light of your financial condition and resources before trading.
By reading this briefing, you acknowledge that Cannon Trading Company shall not be held liable for any trading losses, financial damages, or decisions made in reliance upon the information contained herein, whether sourced from third parties or otherwise. This briefing is distributed for general informational purposes only and does not take into account the specific investment objectives, financial situation, or particular needs of any individual reader.